The logic of proofs, semantically
نویسنده
چکیده
A new semantics is presented for the logic of proofs (LP), [1, 2], based on the intuition that it is a logic of explicit knowledge. This semantics is used to give new proofs of several basic results concerning LP. In particular, the realization of S4 into LP is established in a way that carefully examines and explicates the role of the + operator. Finally connections are made with the conventional approach, via soundness and completeness results.
منابع مشابه
Towards mechanized correctness proofs for cryptographic algorithms: Axiomatization of a probabilistic Hoare style logic
In [5] we build a formal verification technique for game based correctness proofs of cryptograhic algorithms based on a probabilistic Hoare style logic [10]. An important step towards enabling mechanized verification within this technique is an axiomatization of implication between predicates which is purely semantically defined in [10]. In this paper we provide an axiomatization and illustrate...
متن کاملCognitive Binary Logic - The Natural Unified Formal Theory of Propositional Binary Logic
This paper presents a formal theory which describes propositional binary logic as a semantically closed formal language, and allows for syntactically and semantically well-formed formulae, formal proofs (demonstrability in Hilbertian acception), deduction (Gentzen’s view of demonstrability), CNF-ization, and deconstruction to be expressed and tested in the same (computational) formal language, ...
متن کاملRevantha Ramanayake Cut - elimination for Weak Grzegorczyk Logic Go
We present a syntactic proof of cut-elimination for weak Grzegorczyk logic Go. The logic has a syntactically similar axiomatisation to Gödel–Löb logic GL (provability logic) and Grzegorczyk’s logic Grz. Semantically, GL can be viewed as the irreflexive counterpart of Go, and Grz can be viewed as the reflexive counterpart of Go. Although proofs of syntactic cut-elimination for GL and Grz have ap...
متن کاملTruth Values and Connectives in Some Non-Classical Logics
The question as to whether the propositional logic of Heyting, which was a formalization of Brouwer's intuitionistic logic, is finitely many valued or not, was open for a while (the question was asked by Hahn). Kurt Gödel (1932) introduced an infinite decreasing chain of intermediate logics, which are known nowadays as Gödel logics, for showing that the intuitionistic logic is not finitely (man...
متن کاملQuestions as information types
This paper argues that there is an important role to be played by questions in logic, both semantically and proof-theoretically. Semantically, we show that, by generalizing the classical notion of entailment to questions, we can capture not only the standard relation of logical consequence, which concerns specific pieces of information, but also the relation of logical dependency, which concern...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Ann. Pure Appl. Logic
دوره 132 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005